Cessna 150 and 152 Climb Rate: Sea-Level Reference Figures

The published sea-level rate of climb is a reference point for comparing Cessna 150 and 152 model years. It is not a guaranteed climb rate at another elevation, weight or temperature. The table preserves the model, year and units rather than presenting a single family-wide figure.

View through a Cessna 152 windscreen on final approach to Wedderburn
A Cessna 152 on final approach to Wedderburn Airport. The cockpit view connects the instruments with the view toward the runway. Photo: Seaplane silly · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0. Resized, WebP.

What a sea-level figure answers

A rate in feet per minute describes vertical progress with time under the publication's conditions. It does not by itself describe obstacle clearance along a departure path. That question also depends on forward progress and the conditions governing the takeoff and climb. Keep takeoff distance and climb-rate research connected, while treating them as separate quantities.

Published sea-level climb rates (21 records)
Published sea-level climb rates
Reference familyYearModelMetricValueUnitsSource
Cessna 1501960150Sea-level rate of climb740fpm[1]
Cessna 1501961150ASea-level rate of climb740fpm[2]
Cessna 1501962150BSea-level rate of climb760fpm[3]
Cessna 1501963150CSea-level rate of climb760fpm[4]
Cessna 1501964150DSea-level rate of climb670fpm[5]
Cessna 1501965150ESea-level rate of climb670fpm[6]
Cessna 1501966150FSea-level rate of climb670fpm[7]
Cessna 1501967150GSea-level rate of climb670fpm[8]
Cessna 1501969150JSea-level rate of climb670fpm[9]
Cessna 1501970150KSea-level rate of climb670fpm[10]
Cessna 1501971150LSea-level rate of climb670fpm[11]
Cessna 1501972150LSea-level rate of climb670fpm[12]
Cessna 1501973150LSea-level rate of climb670fpm[13]
Cessna 1501974150LSea-level rate of climb670fpm[14]
Cessna 1501977150MSea-level rate of climb670fpm[15]
Cessna 1521978152Sea-level rate of climb715fpm[16]
Cessna 1521979152Sea-level rate of climb715fpm[17]
Cessna 1521980152Sea-level rate of climb715fpm[18]
Cessna 1521981152Sea-level rate of climb715fpm[19]
Cessna 1521982152Sea-level rate of climb715fpm[20]
Cessna 1521985152Sea-level rate of climb715fpm[21]
Cessna 150 airborne just above a runway
A Cessna 150 taking off. This photograph illustrates the flight phase; it is not a source of takeoff distances or operating speeds. Photo: Navigator-avia · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 3.0. Resized, WebP.

Missing conditions remain missing

Several normalized headline records have no detailed condition note. Their absence should not be filled by assuming that every year used an identical test weight, temperature or technique. The historical figures are useful for locating relevant publications and understanding the broad model sequence. For a controlled comparison, find the matching performance charts and retain every stated condition.

Changes in engine rating do not justify scaling climb rate by the percentage increase in horsepower. Aircraft weight, propeller application and other configuration differences also matter. Compare the O-200-A and the O-235-L2C as complete installations instead of treating their nameplate ratings as a climb calculator.

Researching a particular aircraft

Start with its legal model and the current weight-and-balance record. Identify any modification that changes the applicable flight-manual information. Then use the approved performance material for the actual departure conditions. A factory eligibility record is useful background, but it cannot prove that the original engine or propeller remains installed.

The service-ceiling reference addresses another often-confused headline: a published altitude limit on climb capability is not the same thing as the climb rate available near the ground.

Advertisement
Responsive bannerAdvertise on C150152.com
Cessna 152 cockpit with two control wheels and a central radio stack
A Cessna 152 training cockpit with the instrument panel and both control wheels visible. This is one aircraft configuration. Photo: BestOnLifeform · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0. Resized, WebP.

A useful comparison record

Write down the source year, legal model and the publication behind the climb figure. Then record the conditions still needed to make the comparison operationally meaningful. This separates a missing chart input from an actual aircraft limitation. It also gives the reviewing pilot or mechanic a precise question to resolve, instead of asking whether a model generally climbs well without stating the mission.

Related research